tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6342856829001765305.post1878517426278598555..comments2024-03-21T23:31:28.521-04:00Comments on Irregular Velo Adventures: Nov-19 + 20: Choices Made and Unmadeskiffrunhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17627376178648891371noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6342856829001765305.post-84315641894613849322011-11-22T07:22:48.340-05:002011-11-22T07:22:48.340-05:00I received an e-mail pointing out that BR #1 is re...I received an e-mail pointing out that BR #1 is referred to as "US BR #1" by the NC-DOT. Given the text of the message, I assume the VA-DOT (or whomever maintains the BR signage, etc. in VA) does the same. <br /><br />I have changed this post to refer to "US" instead of "NC". However, there appear to be about 32 prior posts that refer to "NC BR #1" -- I'm not going to hunt down and change those references. There is also at least one post that refers to "VA BR #1" -- I'm not changing that either. Besides, in context of that ride and that story, we didn't really know where we were going, so referencing "VA" instead of "US" does at least help with the geographical understanding of where we were at that point / moment of the ride. <br /><br />I note that my recollection is that when I ordered the map of the NC segment of BR #1 a few years ago, the NC-DOT verbiage on the website indicated that NC was NOT part of the compact-of-states organizing / maintaining "US BR #1". However, a check of the NC-DOT website today does indicate that NC-DOT refers to BR #1 in NC as "US BR #1". Either NC has joined the compact (which the above referenced e-mail implied consisted of two states) or I misunderstood the NC-DOT website those few years ago. <br /><br />If I misunderstood / was wrong ... all I can write is ... GREAT!! I hope to live long enough to be wrong many more times!skiffrunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17627376178648891371noreply@blogger.com