Thursday, December 17, 2009

Farther means Faster - - - NOT

few days ago I wrote that I could identify three generic reasons why my longest ride quartile had a faster avg pace than the three shorter quartiles.  There are more than three including that (a) the short rides tend to be a mix of intense faster rides and OMG recovery rides and (b) I often take 2 hours or even 40 miles to warm up and start pedaling; however, I will stick to the "three" alluded to previously. 

1.  Five mountain rides. 

Three mountain rides fit in the shortest quartile; two fit in the second quartile.  Five rides, avg distance 28.9 miles, avg pace 12.7 mph.  Avg amount of climbing on the mtn rides = approx 109 ft per mile.  (The avg climbing north of Raleigh is about 45 ft per mile.)  (All climbing estimates developed using "veloroutes.org".)

2.  Four "mechanical rides" / "riding with slower friends" rides.

All four ride fit in the shortest quartile.  Four rides, avg distance 17.9 miles, avg pace 14.3 miles. 

If I remove the above 9 rides from the data-base, and let the quartiles "re-sort" themselves, the following emerges:

Quartile Report of Short to Long Rides -- Mtn, "slow-friend" and "mechanical" rides removed:

. . miles . . . # rides . tot miles . tot hrs . avg mph . avg miles

.LT., = 30.0 . . 27 . . . . 667.8 . . . 40.9 . . 16.3 . . . 24.7
30.0 - 47.1 . . .27 . . .1,064.3 . . . 67.0 . . 15.9 . . . 39.4
47.1 - 69.9. . . 28 . . .1,638.2 . . .103.7 . .15.8 . . . 58.5
69.9 - plus . . . 27 . . .2,234.8 . . .140.4 . .15.9 . . . 82.8

total . . . . . .. 109 . . .5,605.1 . . .352.1 . .15.9 . . . 51.4
 
That is much more in line with what I would expect.  Notice that the longest quartile of rides is still "pretty fast" (for me).  Why is that? 
 
3.  Fast "irregulars" to pull me along on the longer rides.
 
Thanks!

No comments:

Post a Comment