I've asked myself that before.
I've even written a bit about that somewhere in / on this blog previously.
It started out as being for me and also a sort-of backup of cycling data.
It morphed into being about and for the Irregulars.
Then I took up randonneuring, and the audience changed.
And I started trying to type with the greater rando audience in mind.
Somewhere along the way, I lost the knack of writing an Irregular story for the Irregular audience.
I think I've been making Irregular posts for the larger, amorphous rando world.
The Irregular posts come out better if I think in terms of the more intimate Irregular world.
No need to explain inside jokes, etc. -- just type them.
That is my opinion.
So ...
I'm going to try to remember to blog rando-rides with the rando world in part of my mind,
I'm going to try to remember to blog Irregular ride with Irregulars in part of my mind.
And, of course, I will always try to have myself in at least part of mind.
Will that make a difference in how the write-ups come out?
I dunno'.
------------------------------------------------------------
Assuming they make any posts, IvaHawk and Ricochet Robert will make their posts in whatever voice and for whatever audience they choose.
The only restrictions on each us of are: no politics, no religion, and darn little real-world life,
No comments:
Post a Comment